Showing posts with label purchasing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label purchasing. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Purchasing SQL Server 2005

I have been tasked with determining which edition of SQL server 2005 to purchase for my business.

We currently have SQL server 2005 Enterprise Edition, although due to the spec of our laptops (operating system) we cannot install the full version of this on our laptops (2gb database capped limit)

The laptop specification is:
1.66 Ghz Intel Centrino Duo
1 Gb Ram
60 Gb HDD
Microsoft Windows XP Profressional Version 2002, SP2 (64 bit?)

I believe the Standard Edition will enable us to have an uncapped SQL Server 2005 database limit on the laptops.

Alternatively, please could anybody advise which edition should be purchased

Many thanks

You haven't mentioned about what kind of business you have and wanted to use SQL Server.

I believe you can look into Workgroup edition or SQLExpress of SQL and still I would like to know the size of userbase & database.

|||

I am an Analyst and I need to analyse 5gb + of financial data.

Would Standard edition or Developer edition not suffice?

|||Then Standard edition should do the job, to handle the application.

Purchasing SQL

I've looked through a number of sites trying to find the difference between
the different "types" of SQL Server. We have a company that has
approximately 50 internal website users and approximately 2-3000 external
website users (no idea how many concurrent).
What type of SQL Server software will we need? My last company had SQL
2000 Enterprise, but they had a legitimate budget. This company is
searching on pricegrabber for Standard Edition 1 processor licenses and
trying to find the cheapest deal (you wouldn't believe this if you saw it).
Anyway, I'd like to provide some insight...as I know they're about to get
ripped off, but I figured I'd do some homework first. Any info would be
fantastic. Thanks.
James
"James Baker" <cppjames@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:u7lhHaSXEHA.2408@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I've looked through a number of sites trying to find the difference
between
> the different "types" of SQL Server. We have a company that has
> approximately 50 internal website users and approximately 2-3000 external
> website users (no idea how many concurrent).
> What type of SQL Server software will we need? My last company had SQL
> 2000 Enterprise, but they had a legitimate budget. This company is
> searching on pricegrabber for Standard Edition 1 processor licenses and
> trying to find the cheapest deal (you wouldn't believe this if you saw
it).
> Anyway, I'd like to provide some insight...as I know they're about to get
> ripped off, but I figured I'd do some homework first. Any info would be
> fantastic. Thanks.
One of the biggest drawbacks of standard vs. enterprise is the 2 gig memory
limit on standard. Of course, there are other features/benefits of
enterprise, but that is a deciding factor for a lot of people.
-John Oakes

> James
>
|||"James Baker" <cppjames@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:u7lhHaSXEHA.2408@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I've looked through a number of sites trying to find the difference
between
> the different "types" of SQL Server. We have a company that has
> approximately 50 internal website users and approximately 2-3000 external
> website users (no idea how many concurrent).
> What type of SQL Server software will we need? My last company had SQL
> 2000 Enterprise, but they had a legitimate budget. This company is
> searching on pricegrabber for Standard Edition 1 processor licenses and
> trying to find the cheapest deal (you wouldn't believe this if you saw
it).
> Anyway, I'd like to provide some insight...as I know they're about to get
> ripped off, but I figured I'd do some homework first. Any info would be
> fantastic. Thanks.
One of the biggest drawbacks of standard vs. enterprise is the 2 gig memory
limit on standard. Of course, there are other features/benefits of
enterprise, but that is a deciding factor for a lot of people.
-John Oakes

> James
>
|||How many SQL Server boxes are you going to have? You could have thousands
of websites pointing to one SQL Server if you wanted. Or you could have one
SQL Server box per web site.
You mention that "they're about to get ripped off." What does that mean?
Are "they" spending too much? Do "they" think that they need to purchase
one copy of SQL Server for every web server?
You are correct in searching for the Per Processor license, as this is what
you will need in order to use it to drive a web site (or sites).
The standard Edition of SQL Server is usually sufficient for most people.
Enterprise does have some additional high availability features (clustering)
and some other features that can improve performance (indexed views, greater
memory support), but those features come at a cost.
Only you can determine what features you require. These features will
determine what version of SQL Server to purchase.
Keith
"James Baker" <cppjames@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:u7lhHaSXEHA.2408@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I've looked through a number of sites trying to find the difference
between
> the different "types" of SQL Server. We have a company that has
> approximately 50 internal website users and approximately 2-3000 external
> website users (no idea how many concurrent).
> What type of SQL Server software will we need? My last company had SQL
> 2000 Enterprise, but they had a legitimate budget. This company is
> searching on pricegrabber for Standard Edition 1 processor licenses and
> trying to find the cheapest deal (you wouldn't believe this if you saw
it).
> Anyway, I'd like to provide some insight...as I know they're about to get
> ripped off, but I figured I'd do some homework first. Any info would be
> fantastic. Thanks.
> James
>
|||Thanks for the reply. We'll only have one SQL Server box. When I said
they're about to get ripped off...I meant that they're searching for the
software on sketchy sites with rather large discounts. Microsoft is selling
the processor license for $5000 if I'm reading this anywhere near right, and
they're looking at copies that are barely over $1000. It just doesn't seem
"kosher" to me. The 2 Gig limit...that refers to the amount of memory the
box itself can have? I don't know that this would be a problem or not.
I'll have to look into that.
Thanks,
James
"Keith Kratochvil" <sqlguy.back2u@.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:OGZW8nSXEHA.1000@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> How many SQL Server boxes are you going to have? You could have thousands
> of websites pointing to one SQL Server if you wanted. Or you could have
one
> SQL Server box per web site.
> You mention that "they're about to get ripped off." What does that mean?
> Are "they" spending too much? Do "they" think that they need to purchase
> one copy of SQL Server for every web server?
> You are correct in searching for the Per Processor license, as this is
what
> you will need in order to use it to drive a web site (or sites).
> The standard Edition of SQL Server is usually sufficient for most people.
> Enterprise does have some additional high availability features
(clustering)
> and some other features that can improve performance (indexed views,
greater[vbcol=seagreen]
> memory support), but those features come at a cost.
> Only you can determine what features you require. These features will
> determine what version of SQL Server to purchase.
> --
> Keith
>
> "James Baker" <cppjames@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:u7lhHaSXEHA.2408@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> between
external[vbcol=seagreen]
> it).
get
>
|||How many SQL Server boxes are you going to have? You could have thousands
of websites pointing to one SQL Server if you wanted. Or you could have one
SQL Server box per web site.
You mention that "they're about to get ripped off." What does that mean?
Are "they" spending too much? Do "they" think that they need to purchase
one copy of SQL Server for every web server?
You are correct in searching for the Per Processor license, as this is what
you will need in order to use it to drive a web site (or sites).
The standard Edition of SQL Server is usually sufficient for most people.
Enterprise does have some additional high availability features (clustering)
and some other features that can improve performance (indexed views, greater
memory support), but those features come at a cost.
Only you can determine what features you require. These features will
determine what version of SQL Server to purchase.
Keith
"James Baker" <cppjames@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:u7lhHaSXEHA.2408@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I've looked through a number of sites trying to find the difference
between
> the different "types" of SQL Server. We have a company that has
> approximately 50 internal website users and approximately 2-3000 external
> website users (no idea how many concurrent).
> What type of SQL Server software will we need? My last company had SQL
> 2000 Enterprise, but they had a legitimate budget. This company is
> searching on pricegrabber for Standard Edition 1 processor licenses and
> trying to find the cheapest deal (you wouldn't believe this if you saw
it).
> Anyway, I'd like to provide some insight...as I know they're about to get
> ripped off, but I figured I'd do some homework first. Any info would be
> fantastic. Thanks.
> James
>
|||Thanks for the reply. We'll only have one SQL Server box. When I said
they're about to get ripped off...I meant that they're searching for the
software on sketchy sites with rather large discounts. Microsoft is selling
the processor license for $5000 if I'm reading this anywhere near right, and
they're looking at copies that are barely over $1000. It just doesn't seem
"kosher" to me. The 2 Gig limit...that refers to the amount of memory the
box itself can have? I don't know that this would be a problem or not.
I'll have to look into that.
Thanks,
James
"Keith Kratochvil" <sqlguy.back2u@.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:OGZW8nSXEHA.1000@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> How many SQL Server boxes are you going to have? You could have thousands
> of websites pointing to one SQL Server if you wanted. Or you could have
one
> SQL Server box per web site.
> You mention that "they're about to get ripped off." What does that mean?
> Are "they" spending too much? Do "they" think that they need to purchase
> one copy of SQL Server for every web server?
> You are correct in searching for the Per Processor license, as this is
what
> you will need in order to use it to drive a web site (or sites).
> The standard Edition of SQL Server is usually sufficient for most people.
> Enterprise does have some additional high availability features
(clustering)
> and some other features that can improve performance (indexed views,
greater[vbcol=seagreen]
> memory support), but those features come at a cost.
> Only you can determine what features you require. These features will
> determine what version of SQL Server to purchase.
> --
> Keith
>
> "James Baker" <cppjames@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:u7lhHaSXEHA.2408@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> between
external[vbcol=seagreen]
> it).
get
>

Purchasing SQL

I've looked through a number of sites trying to find the difference between
the different "types" of SQL Server. We have a company that has
approximately 50 internal website users and approximately 2-3000 external
website users (no idea how many concurrent).
What type of SQL Server software will we need? My last company had SQL
2000 Enterprise, but they had a legitimate budget. This company is
searching on pricegrabber for Standard Edition 1 processor licenses and
trying to find the cheapest deal (you wouldn't believe this if you saw it).
Anyway, I'd like to provide some insight...as I know they're about to get
ripped off, but I figured I'd do some homework first. Any info would be
fantastic. Thanks.
James"James Baker" <cppjames@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:u7lhHaSXEHA.2408@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I've looked through a number of sites trying to find the difference
between
> the different "types" of SQL Server. We have a company that has
> approximately 50 internal website users and approximately 2-3000 external
> website users (no idea how many concurrent).
> What type of SQL Server software will we need? My last company had SQL
> 2000 Enterprise, but they had a legitimate budget. This company is
> searching on pricegrabber for Standard Edition 1 processor licenses and
> trying to find the cheapest deal (you wouldn't believe this if you saw
it).
> Anyway, I'd like to provide some insight...as I know they're about to get
> ripped off, but I figured I'd do some homework first. Any info would be
> fantastic. Thanks.
One of the biggest drawbacks of standard vs. enterprise is the 2 gig memory
limit on standard. Of course, there are other features/benefits of
enterprise, but that is a deciding factor for a lot of people.
-John Oakes

> James
>|||How many SQL Server boxes are you going to have? You could have thousands
of websites pointing to one SQL Server if you wanted. Or you could have one
SQL Server box per web site.
You mention that "they're about to get ripped off." What does that mean?
Are "they" spending too much? Do "they" think that they need to purchase
one copy of SQL Server for every web server?
You are correct in searching for the Per Processor license, as this is what
you will need in order to use it to drive a web site (or sites).
The standard Edition of SQL Server is usually sufficient for most people.
Enterprise does have some additional high availability features (clustering)
and some other features that can improve performance (indexed views, greater
memory support), but those features come at a cost.
Only you can determine what features you require. These features will
determine what version of SQL Server to purchase.
Keith
"James Baker" <cppjames@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:u7lhHaSXEHA.2408@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I've looked through a number of sites trying to find the difference
between
> the different "types" of SQL Server. We have a company that has
> approximately 50 internal website users and approximately 2-3000 external
> website users (no idea how many concurrent).
> What type of SQL Server software will we need? My last company had SQL
> 2000 Enterprise, but they had a legitimate budget. This company is
> searching on pricegrabber for Standard Edition 1 processor licenses and
> trying to find the cheapest deal (you wouldn't believe this if you saw
it).
> Anyway, I'd like to provide some insight...as I know they're about to get
> ripped off, but I figured I'd do some homework first. Any info would be
> fantastic. Thanks.
> James
>|||Thanks for the reply. We'll only have one SQL Server box. When I said
they're about to get ripped off...I meant that they're searching for the
software on sketchy sites with rather large discounts. Microsoft is selling
the processor license for $5000 if I'm reading this anywhere near right, and
they're looking at copies that are barely over $1000. It just doesn't seem
"kosher" to me. The 2 Gig limit...that refers to the amount of memory the
box itself can have? I don't know that this would be a problem or not.
I'll have to look into that.
Thanks,
James
"Keith Kratochvil" <sqlguy.back2u@.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:OGZW8nSXEHA.1000@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> How many SQL Server boxes are you going to have? You could have thousands
> of websites pointing to one SQL Server if you wanted. Or you could have
one
> SQL Server box per web site.
> You mention that "they're about to get ripped off." What does that mean?
> Are "they" spending too much? Do "they" think that they need to purchase
> one copy of SQL Server for every web server?
> You are correct in searching for the Per Processor license, as this is
what
> you will need in order to use it to drive a web site (or sites).
> The standard Edition of SQL Server is usually sufficient for most people.
> Enterprise does have some additional high availability features
(clustering)
> and some other features that can improve performance (indexed views,
greater
> memory support), but those features come at a cost.
> Only you can determine what features you require. These features will
> determine what version of SQL Server to purchase.
> --
> Keith
>
> "James Baker" <cppjames@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:u7lhHaSXEHA.2408@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> between
external[vbcol=seagreen]
> it).
get[vbcol=seagreen]
>

Purchasing SQL

I've looked through a number of sites trying to find the difference between
the different "types" of SQL Server. We have a company that has
approximately 50 internal website users and approximately 2-3000 external
website users (no idea how many concurrent).
What type of SQL Server software will we need? My last company had SQL
2000 Enterprise, but they had a legitimate budget. This company is
searching on pricegrabber for Standard Edition 1 processor licenses and
trying to find the cheapest deal (you wouldn't believe this if you saw it).
Anyway, I'd like to provide some insight...as I know they're about to get
ripped off, but I figured I'd do some homework first. Any info would be
fantastic. Thanks.
James"James Baker" <cppjames@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:u7lhHaSXEHA.2408@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I've looked through a number of sites trying to find the difference
between
> the different "types" of SQL Server. We have a company that has
> approximately 50 internal website users and approximately 2-3000 external
> website users (no idea how many concurrent).
> What type of SQL Server software will we need? My last company had SQL
> 2000 Enterprise, but they had a legitimate budget. This company is
> searching on pricegrabber for Standard Edition 1 processor licenses and
> trying to find the cheapest deal (you wouldn't believe this if you saw
it).
> Anyway, I'd like to provide some insight...as I know they're about to get
> ripped off, but I figured I'd do some homework first. Any info would be
> fantastic. Thanks.
One of the biggest drawbacks of standard vs. enterprise is the 2 gig memory
limit on standard. Of course, there are other features/benefits of
enterprise, but that is a deciding factor for a lot of people.
-John Oakes
> James
>|||How many SQL Server boxes are you going to have? You could have thousands
of websites pointing to one SQL Server if you wanted. Or you could have one
SQL Server box per web site.
You mention that "they're about to get ripped off." What does that mean?
Are "they" spending too much? Do "they" think that they need to purchase
one copy of SQL Server for every web server?
You are correct in searching for the Per Processor license, as this is what
you will need in order to use it to drive a web site (or sites).
The standard Edition of SQL Server is usually sufficient for most people.
Enterprise does have some additional high availability features (clustering)
and some other features that can improve performance (indexed views, greater
memory support), but those features come at a cost.
Only you can determine what features you require. These features will
determine what version of SQL Server to purchase.
--
Keith
"James Baker" <cppjames@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:u7lhHaSXEHA.2408@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I've looked through a number of sites trying to find the difference
between
> the different "types" of SQL Server. We have a company that has
> approximately 50 internal website users and approximately 2-3000 external
> website users (no idea how many concurrent).
> What type of SQL Server software will we need? My last company had SQL
> 2000 Enterprise, but they had a legitimate budget. This company is
> searching on pricegrabber for Standard Edition 1 processor licenses and
> trying to find the cheapest deal (you wouldn't believe this if you saw
it).
> Anyway, I'd like to provide some insight...as I know they're about to get
> ripped off, but I figured I'd do some homework first. Any info would be
> fantastic. Thanks.
> James
>|||Thanks for the reply. We'll only have one SQL Server box. When I said
they're about to get ripped off...I meant that they're searching for the
software on sketchy sites with rather large discounts. Microsoft is selling
the processor license for $5000 if I'm reading this anywhere near right, and
they're looking at copies that are barely over $1000. It just doesn't seem
"kosher" to me. The 2 Gig limit...that refers to the amount of memory the
box itself can have? I don't know that this would be a problem or not.
I'll have to look into that.
Thanks,
James
"Keith Kratochvil" <sqlguy.back2u@.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:OGZW8nSXEHA.1000@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> How many SQL Server boxes are you going to have? You could have thousands
> of websites pointing to one SQL Server if you wanted. Or you could have
one
> SQL Server box per web site.
> You mention that "they're about to get ripped off." What does that mean?
> Are "they" spending too much? Do "they" think that they need to purchase
> one copy of SQL Server for every web server?
> You are correct in searching for the Per Processor license, as this is
what
> you will need in order to use it to drive a web site (or sites).
> The standard Edition of SQL Server is usually sufficient for most people.
> Enterprise does have some additional high availability features
(clustering)
> and some other features that can improve performance (indexed views,
greater
> memory support), but those features come at a cost.
> Only you can determine what features you require. These features will
> determine what version of SQL Server to purchase.
> --
> Keith
>
> "James Baker" <cppjames@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:u7lhHaSXEHA.2408@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > I've looked through a number of sites trying to find the difference
> between
> > the different "types" of SQL Server. We have a company that has
> > approximately 50 internal website users and approximately 2-3000
external
> > website users (no idea how many concurrent).
> >
> > What type of SQL Server software will we need? My last company had SQL
> > 2000 Enterprise, but they had a legitimate budget. This company is
> > searching on pricegrabber for Standard Edition 1 processor licenses and
> > trying to find the cheapest deal (you wouldn't believe this if you saw
> it).
> > Anyway, I'd like to provide some insight...as I know they're about to
get
> > ripped off, but I figured I'd do some homework first. Any info would be
> > fantastic. Thanks.
> >
> > James
> >
> >
>|||Yeah, $1000 seems pretty cheap. Are they looking at the processor license,
or the 5 client license?
I jumped out to Buy.com (what I would consider a reputable vendor) and here
are the prices for Standard Edition SQL2k:
5 client license$1360
http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=20321483&loc=105&sp=1
processor license $4440
http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=20321507&loc=105&sp=1
The 2GB memory limit refers to what SQL Server Standard Edition will use.
Search Books Online (the SQL Server documentation) for "maximum capacity
specifications"
If you don't have Books Online you can download it here:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/productdoc/2000/books.asp
--
Keith
"James Baker" <cppjames@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:e734erSXEHA.3716@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Thanks for the reply. We'll only have one SQL Server box. When I said
> they're about to get ripped off...I meant that they're searching for the
> software on sketchy sites with rather large discounts. Microsoft is
selling
> the processor license for $5000 if I'm reading this anywhere near right,
and
> they're looking at copies that are barely over $1000. It just doesn't
seem
> "kosher" to me. The 2 Gig limit...that refers to the amount of memory the
> box itself can have? I don't know that this would be a problem or not.
> I'll have to look into that.
> Thanks,
> James
>
> "Keith Kratochvil" <sqlguy.back2u@.comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:OGZW8nSXEHA.1000@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > How many SQL Server boxes are you going to have? You could have
thousands
> > of websites pointing to one SQL Server if you wanted. Or you could have
> one
> > SQL Server box per web site.
> >
> > You mention that "they're about to get ripped off." What does that
mean?
> > Are "they" spending too much? Do "they" think that they need to
purchase
> > one copy of SQL Server for every web server?
> >
> > You are correct in searching for the Per Processor license, as this is
> what
> > you will need in order to use it to drive a web site (or sites).
> >
> > The standard Edition of SQL Server is usually sufficient for most
people.
> > Enterprise does have some additional high availability features
> (clustering)
> > and some other features that can improve performance (indexed views,
> greater
> > memory support), but those features come at a cost.
> >
> > Only you can determine what features you require. These features will
> > determine what version of SQL Server to purchase.
> >
> > --
> > Keith
> >
> >
> > "James Baker" <cppjames@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:u7lhHaSXEHA.2408@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > > I've looked through a number of sites trying to find the difference
> > between
> > > the different "types" of SQL Server. We have a company that has
> > > approximately 50 internal website users and approximately 2-3000
> external
> > > website users (no idea how many concurrent).
> > >
> > > What type of SQL Server software will we need? My last company had
SQL
> > > 2000 Enterprise, but they had a legitimate budget. This company is
> > > searching on pricegrabber for Standard Edition 1 processor licenses
and
> > > trying to find the cheapest deal (you wouldn't believe this if you saw
> > it).
> > > Anyway, I'd like to provide some insight...as I know they're about to
> get
> > > ripped off, but I figured I'd do some homework first. Any info would
be
> > > fantastic. Thanks.
> > >
> > > James
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Purchasing Rs2005

Hi, RS2000 was a separate from SQLServer2000 and a free download, only
requirement being you must have a SQLServer 2000 lic. For RS 2005 it looks
like its bundled up with SQLServer 2005. Must I purchase SQLServer 2005 in
order to upgrade to RS 2005, we don't wish to upgrade from SQL2000 just
Reporting Services. In there not a separate download and Licence for RS2005.
ThanksRS 2005 is part of SQL Server 2005. Nothing has changed. RS 2000 was part
(from a licensing perspective) of SQL Server 2000. The only reason it had a
separate download/CD was because it was released later. You can leave the DB
at 2000 and install RS 2005 but you must have a SQL Server 2005 license.
Bruce Loehle-Conger
MVP SQL Server Reporting Services
"Kerry" <Kerry@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:EEB251CF-0871-4530-A95C-F8ECBFE891D9@.microsoft.com...
> Hi, RS2000 was a separate from SQLServer2000 and a free download, only
> requirement being you must have a SQLServer 2000 lic. For RS 2005 it
> looks
> like its bundled up with SQLServer 2005. Must I purchase SQLServer 2005 in
> order to upgrade to RS 2005, we don't wish to upgrade from SQL2000 just
> Reporting Services. In there not a separate download and Licence for
> RS2005.
> Thanks|||Bruce,
Since we would like to do the same change (keep SQL2000 and upgrade from
RS2000 to RS2005), is only (1) one SQL2005 license necessary since we already
have licenses for SQL2000?
Thanks in advance
"Bruce L-C [MVP]" wrote:
> RS 2005 is part of SQL Server 2005. Nothing has changed. RS 2000 was part
> (from a licensing perspective) of SQL Server 2000. The only reason it had a
> separate download/CD was because it was released later. You can leave the DB
> at 2000 and install RS 2005 but you must have a SQL Server 2005 license.
>
> --
> Bruce Loehle-Conger
> MVP SQL Server Reporting Services
> "Kerry" <Kerry@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:EEB251CF-0871-4530-A95C-F8ECBFE891D9@.microsoft.com...
> > Hi, RS2000 was a separate from SQLServer2000 and a free download, only
> > requirement being you must have a SQLServer 2000 lic. For RS 2005 it
> > looks
> > like its bundled up with SQLServer 2005. Must I purchase SQLServer 2005 in
> > order to upgrade to RS 2005, we don't wish to upgrade from SQL2000 just
> > Reporting Services. In there not a separate download and Licence for
> > RS2005.
> >
> > Thanks
>
>|||Is your RS on the same box as SQL Server 2000 Database?
Bruce Loehle-Conger
MVP SQL Server Reporting Services
"JACK (SQL DBA)" <JACK (SQL DBA)@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:D77D3ED1-72CF-4FC6-9019-C52967EDF6A3@.microsoft.com...
> Bruce,
> Since we would like to do the same change (keep SQL2000 and upgrade from
> RS2000 to RS2005), is only (1) one SQL2005 license necessary since we
> already
> have licenses for SQL2000?
> Thanks in advance
> "Bruce L-C [MVP]" wrote:
>> RS 2005 is part of SQL Server 2005. Nothing has changed. RS 2000 was part
>> (from a licensing perspective) of SQL Server 2000. The only reason it had
>> a
>> separate download/CD was because it was released later. You can leave the
>> DB
>> at 2000 and install RS 2005 but you must have a SQL Server 2005 license.
>>
>> --
>> Bruce Loehle-Conger
>> MVP SQL Server Reporting Services
>> "Kerry" <Kerry@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:EEB251CF-0871-4530-A95C-F8ECBFE891D9@.microsoft.com...
>> > Hi, RS2000 was a separate from SQLServer2000 and a free download, only
>> > requirement being you must have a SQLServer 2000 lic. For RS 2005 it
>> > looks
>> > like its bundled up with SQLServer 2005. Must I purchase SQLServer 2005
>> > in
>> > order to upgrade to RS 2005, we don't wish to upgrade from SQL2000 just
>> > Reporting Services. In there not a separate download and Licence for
>> > RS2005.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>>|||Bruce, I am like Jack. I own SQL2000 and use RS2000 but would like to
upgrade to RS2005 without purchasing SQL2005. But it looks like I have to.
Next question is, I only have one server, RS is on the same box as SQL Server
database and I own SQL Server2000 Standard Edition-1 Processor License.
Would I have to purchase the SQL2005 that costs about $5k or is there a
cheaper version I could purchase that would give me rights to use RS2005 on
this machine? Thanks for your help. Jerry
"Bruce L-C [MVP]" wrote:
> Is your RS on the same box as SQL Server 2000 Database?
>
> --
> Bruce Loehle-Conger
> MVP SQL Server Reporting Services
> "JACK (SQL DBA)" <JACK (SQL DBA)@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:D77D3ED1-72CF-4FC6-9019-C52967EDF6A3@.microsoft.com...
> > Bruce,
> >
> > Since we would like to do the same change (keep SQL2000 and upgrade from
> > RS2000 to RS2005), is only (1) one SQL2005 license necessary since we
> > already
> > have licenses for SQL2000?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > "Bruce L-C [MVP]" wrote:
> >
> >> RS 2005 is part of SQL Server 2005. Nothing has changed. RS 2000 was part
> >> (from a licensing perspective) of SQL Server 2000. The only reason it had
> >> a
> >> separate download/CD was because it was released later. You can leave the
> >> DB
> >> at 2000 and install RS 2005 but you must have a SQL Server 2005 license.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Bruce Loehle-Conger
> >> MVP SQL Server Reporting Services
> >>
> >> "Kerry" <Kerry@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:EEB251CF-0871-4530-A95C-F8ECBFE891D9@.microsoft.com...
> >> > Hi, RS2000 was a separate from SQLServer2000 and a free download, only
> >> > requirement being you must have a SQLServer 2000 lic. For RS 2005 it
> >> > looks
> >> > like its bundled up with SQLServer 2005. Must I purchase SQLServer 2005
> >> > in
> >> > order to upgrade to RS 2005, we don't wish to upgrade from SQL2000 just
> >> > Reporting Services. In there not a separate download and Licence for
> >> > RS2005.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>sql

Purchasing Microsoft SQL Server for small company

I currently have a database through a company that has been upkeeping SQL an
d
storing data. I am cancelling subscription and want to retrieve data. They
are sending me a backup DVD with all the files. How easy is it to use
Microsoft SQL and can the files be transfered to another program such as
Access or Excel'
ThanksAre you saying that you have data stored in a SQL Server database, which is
hosted by other company, and you now want to sotre your data by yourself? If
so, the best way to do is to set up your own SQL Server, have you data on
the other SQL Server backed up and restore it on your own SQL Server. (or
use detach/attach database from/to SQL Server).
There are different edition of SQL Server, from very expensive Enterprise
Edition, to free version of SQL Server Express/MSDE. If your data value is
not so big (2G or 4G), you can use MSDE or SQL Server Express for free. Of
course, some basic knowledge on SQL Server is required (I mean a bit more
and complicated that required by using Access).
If you want those data being transferred to Access DB, then you can ask your
SQL Server host to export it to a *.mdb file. However, in general, only data
can be transferred, server object used in that database (view, sp... they
may contain critical logics for using the database) would not be
transferred. So, you would need to build a sort of front end app inorder to
use your data. Unless the only thing you need is the data.
"Eddie" <Eddie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:389AA3B8-1996-487C-A65D-29F4E5404246@.microsoft.com...
>I currently have a database through a company that has been upkeeping SQL
>and
> storing data. I am cancelling subscription and want to retrieve data.
> They
> are sending me a backup DVD with all the files. How easy is it to use
> Microsoft SQL and can the files be transfered to another program such as
> Access or Excel'
> Thanks|||You are taking a big step backward going from SQL Server to MS Access and an
even bigger step if you go to Excel.
Microsoft SQL Server is an enterprise level relational database management
system.
Microsoft Access is a database engine but it is not quite enterprise level.
MS Excel is can be used to display information to management types and
create pretty reports, but it is by no means an enterprise storage
technology.
IF your host sends you the correct information -- backup files created via
the T-SQL BACKUP command OR database and log files after they ran
sp_detach_db -- you should be able to restore the database(s) to a SQL
Server in your environment.
SQL Server does not have "files" (like Excel). It is more similar to MS
Access in that it has tables within one container (a database).
Keith Kratochvil
"Eddie" <Eddie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:389AA3B8-1996-487C-A65D-29F4E5404246@.microsoft.com...
>I currently have a database through a company that has been upkeeping SQL
>and
> storing data. I am cancelling subscription and want to retrieve data.
> They
> are sending me a backup DVD with all the files. How easy is it to use
> Microsoft SQL and can the files be transfered to another program such as
> Access or Excel'
> Thanks|||The company is not using the system to it's fullest potential. The users ar
e
not computer savvy and would prefer a more simple system ie: Access. They
don't want to be paying the fees associated to a program they don't use.
They have 7 years of data they need to access and I have to figure out how.
Once we access the data and can retrieve the reports and pictures we won't b
e
using the system. We want to transfer it to Access.
Thanks
"Norman Yuan" wrote:

> Are you saying that you have data stored in a SQL Server database, which i
s
> hosted by other company, and you now want to sotre your data by yourself?
If
> so, the best way to do is to set up your own SQL Server, have you data on
> the other SQL Server backed up and restore it on your own SQL Server. (or
> use detach/attach database from/to SQL Server).
> There are different edition of SQL Server, from very expensive Enterprise
> Edition, to free version of SQL Server Express/MSDE. If your data value is
> not so big (2G or 4G), you can use MSDE or SQL Server Express for free. Of
> course, some basic knowledge on SQL Server is required (I mean a bit more
> and complicated that required by using Access).
> If you want those data being transferred to Access DB, then you can ask yo
ur
> SQL Server host to export it to a *.mdb file. However, in general, only da
ta
> can be transferred, server object used in that database (view, sp... they
> may contain critical logics for using the database) would not be
> transferred. So, you would need to build a sort of front end app inorder t
o
> use your data. Unless the only thing you need is the data.
> "Eddie" <Eddie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:389AA3B8-1996-487C-A65D-29F4E5404246@.microsoft.com...
>
>|||The company is not using the system to it's fullest potential. The users are
not computer savvy and would prefer a more simple system ie: Access. They
don't want to be paying the fees associated to a program they don't use.
They have 7 years of data they need to access and I have to figure out how.
Once we access the data and can retrieve the reports and pictures we won't b
e
using the system. We want to transfer it to Access.
Thanks
"Keith Kratochvil" wrote:

> You are taking a big step backward going from SQL Server to MS Access and
an
> even bigger step if you go to Excel.
> Microsoft SQL Server is an enterprise level relational database management
> system.
> Microsoft Access is a database engine but it is not quite enterprise level
.
> MS Excel is can be used to display information to management types and
> create pretty reports, but it is by no means an enterprise storage
> technology.
>
> IF your host sends you the correct information -- backup files created via
> the T-SQL BACKUP command OR database and log files after they ran
> sp_detach_db -- you should be able to restore the database(s) to a SQL
> Server in your environment.
>
> SQL Server does not have "files" (like Excel). It is more similar to MS
> Access in that it has tables within one container (a database).
>
> --
> Keith Kratochvil
>
> "Eddie" <Eddie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:389AA3B8-1996-487C-A65D-29F4E5404246@.microsoft.com...
>
>|||Eddie,
You can certainly use Access as the front-end program for
your users, even if you maintain the data in SQL Server.
SQL Server in fact has no front-end, really - just a set of
management tools, so you have many options for your
users.
Since no one has mentioned it, don't overlook the Workgroup
Edition of SQL Server, which might be good for your needs.
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodin...e-features.mspx
Steve Kass
Drew University
Eddie wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
>The company is not using the system to it's fullest potential. The users a
re
>not computer savvy and would prefer a more simple system ie: Access. They
>don't want to be paying the fees associated to a program they don't use.
>They have 7 years of data they need to access and I have to figure out how.
>Once we access the data and can retrieve the reports and pictures we won't
be
>using the system. We want to transfer it to Access.
>Thanks
>"Norman Yuan" wrote:
>
>|||Maybe SQL Server Express combined with MS Access front-ends is the answer.
SS Express is free.
Randall Arnold
"Eddie" <Eddie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:49490C53-3ADC-418F-8E8F-A7468A98DEE4@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> The company is not using the system to it's fullest potential. The users
> are
> not computer savvy and would prefer a more simple system ie: Access. They
> don't want to be paying the fees associated to a program they don't use.
> They have 7 years of data they need to access and I have to figure out
> how.
> Once we access the data and can retrieve the reports and pictures we won't
> be
> using the system. We want to transfer it to Access.
> Thanks
> "Keith Kratochvil" wrote:
>|||So, summarize what you want:
1. You have data stored in database of someone's SQL Server;
2. You need to get all data out in this database and svae them in some
formats you choose;
3. You do not need application related server objects/logics in the database
(views, stored procedures, UDFs) once you retrieved the data;
4. The SQL Server host would not do the data retrieving for you. They can
only give you the backup or data file of the database.
Since you want to transfer data from SQL Server to Access (more accurately,
Jet database), there may be some degree of data or data type or data
accuracy loss because of the differences of the two data engine.
Here is what I would do:
1. Get full backup or detached database file (latter would be better);
2. Install a MSDE, which is free version of SQL Server, if the data file of
the database (*.mdf) is less than 2GB.
3. Restore/attach the databse to MSDE.
4. Use Access as tool to connect to MSDE and start retrieve data. You can
create an Access ADP project to use as MSDE front end UI. Then you can open
each table to export, or write some macro/VBA code to retireve specific data
and output to specific format.
5. Since I have the database on my onw, no-cost MSDE engine, I can try and
try until satisfied totally (of course do it on a copy of the data).
6, Do the final retrieving and then uninstall the MSDE.
"Eddie" <Eddie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:E426270B-5851-456C-B190-1D747BAFA433@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> The company is not using the system to it's fullest potential. The users
> are
> not computer savvy and would prefer a more simple system ie: Access. They
> don't want to be paying the fees associated to a program they don't use.
> They have 7 years of data they need to access and I have to figure out
> how.
> Once we access the data and can retrieve the reports and pictures we won't
> be
> using the system. We want to transfer it to Access.
> Thanks
> "Norman Yuan" wrote:
>

Purchasing Microsoft SQL Server for small company

I currently have a database through a company that has been upkeeping SQL and
storing data. I am cancelling subscription and want to retrieve data. They
are sending me a backup DVD with all the files. How easy is it to use
Microsoft SQL and can the files be transfered to another program such as
Access or Excel'
ThanksAre you saying that you have data stored in a SQL Server database, which is
hosted by other company, and you now want to sotre your data by yourself? If
so, the best way to do is to set up your own SQL Server, have you data on
the other SQL Server backed up and restore it on your own SQL Server. (or
use detach/attach database from/to SQL Server).
There are different edition of SQL Server, from very expensive Enterprise
Edition, to free version of SQL Server Express/MSDE. If your data value is
not so big (2G or 4G), you can use MSDE or SQL Server Express for free. Of
course, some basic knowledge on SQL Server is required (I mean a bit more
and complicated that required by using Access).
If you want those data being transferred to Access DB, then you can ask your
SQL Server host to export it to a *.mdb file. However, in general, only data
can be transferred, server object used in that database (view, sp... they
may contain critical logics for using the database) would not be
transferred. So, you would need to build a sort of front end app inorder to
use your data. Unless the only thing you need is the data.
"Eddie" <Eddie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:389AA3B8-1996-487C-A65D-29F4E5404246@.microsoft.com...
>I currently have a database through a company that has been upkeeping SQL
>and
> storing data. I am cancelling subscription and want to retrieve data.
> They
> are sending me a backup DVD with all the files. How easy is it to use
> Microsoft SQL and can the files be transfered to another program such as
> Access or Excel'
> Thanks|||You are taking a big step backward going from SQL Server to MS Access and an
even bigger step if you go to Excel.
Microsoft SQL Server is an enterprise level relational database management
system.
Microsoft Access is a database engine but it is not quite enterprise level.
MS Excel is can be used to display information to management types and
create pretty reports, but it is by no means an enterprise storage
technology.
IF your host sends you the correct information -- backup files created via
the T-SQL BACKUP command OR database and log files after they ran
sp_detach_db -- you should be able to restore the database(s) to a SQL
Server in your environment.
SQL Server does not have "files" (like Excel). It is more similar to MS
Access in that it has tables within one container (a database).
Keith Kratochvil
"Eddie" <Eddie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:389AA3B8-1996-487C-A65D-29F4E5404246@.microsoft.com...
>I currently have a database through a company that has been upkeeping SQL
>and
> storing data. I am cancelling subscription and want to retrieve data.
> They
> are sending me a backup DVD with all the files. How easy is it to use
> Microsoft SQL and can the files be transfered to another program such as
> Access or Excel'
> Thanks|||The company is not using the system to it's fullest potential. The users are
not computer savvy and would prefer a more simple system ie: Access. They
don't want to be paying the fees associated to a program they don't use.
They have 7 years of data they need to access and I have to figure out how.
Once we access the data and can retrieve the reports and pictures we won't be
using the system. We want to transfer it to Access.
Thanks
"Norman Yuan" wrote:
> Are you saying that you have data stored in a SQL Server database, which is
> hosted by other company, and you now want to sotre your data by yourself? If
> so, the best way to do is to set up your own SQL Server, have you data on
> the other SQL Server backed up and restore it on your own SQL Server. (or
> use detach/attach database from/to SQL Server).
> There are different edition of SQL Server, from very expensive Enterprise
> Edition, to free version of SQL Server Express/MSDE. If your data value is
> not so big (2G or 4G), you can use MSDE or SQL Server Express for free. Of
> course, some basic knowledge on SQL Server is required (I mean a bit more
> and complicated that required by using Access).
> If you want those data being transferred to Access DB, then you can ask your
> SQL Server host to export it to a *.mdb file. However, in general, only data
> can be transferred, server object used in that database (view, sp... they
> may contain critical logics for using the database) would not be
> transferred. So, you would need to build a sort of front end app inorder to
> use your data. Unless the only thing you need is the data.
> "Eddie" <Eddie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:389AA3B8-1996-487C-A65D-29F4E5404246@.microsoft.com...
> >I currently have a database through a company that has been upkeeping SQL
> >and
> > storing data. I am cancelling subscription and want to retrieve data.
> > They
> > are sending me a backup DVD with all the files. How easy is it to use
> > Microsoft SQL and can the files be transfered to another program such as
> > Access or Excel'
> >
> > Thanks
>
>|||The company is not using the system to it's fullest potential. The users are
not computer savvy and would prefer a more simple system ie: Access. They
don't want to be paying the fees associated to a program they don't use.
They have 7 years of data they need to access and I have to figure out how.
Once we access the data and can retrieve the reports and pictures we won't be
using the system. We want to transfer it to Access.
Thanks
"Keith Kratochvil" wrote:
> You are taking a big step backward going from SQL Server to MS Access and an
> even bigger step if you go to Excel.
> Microsoft SQL Server is an enterprise level relational database management
> system.
> Microsoft Access is a database engine but it is not quite enterprise level.
> MS Excel is can be used to display information to management types and
> create pretty reports, but it is by no means an enterprise storage
> technology.
>
> IF your host sends you the correct information -- backup files created via
> the T-SQL BACKUP command OR database and log files after they ran
> sp_detach_db -- you should be able to restore the database(s) to a SQL
> Server in your environment.
>
> SQL Server does not have "files" (like Excel). It is more similar to MS
> Access in that it has tables within one container (a database).
>
> --
> Keith Kratochvil
>
> "Eddie" <Eddie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:389AA3B8-1996-487C-A65D-29F4E5404246@.microsoft.com...
> >I currently have a database through a company that has been upkeeping SQL
> >and
> > storing data. I am cancelling subscription and want to retrieve data.
> > They
> > are sending me a backup DVD with all the files. How easy is it to use
> > Microsoft SQL and can the files be transfered to another program such as
> > Access or Excel'
> >
> > Thanks
>
>|||Maybe SQL Server Express combined with MS Access front-ends is the answer.
SS Express is free.
Randall Arnold
"Eddie" <Eddie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:49490C53-3ADC-418F-8E8F-A7468A98DEE4@.microsoft.com...
> The company is not using the system to it's fullest potential. The users
> are
> not computer savvy and would prefer a more simple system ie: Access. They
> don't want to be paying the fees associated to a program they don't use.
> They have 7 years of data they need to access and I have to figure out
> how.
> Once we access the data and can retrieve the reports and pictures we won't
> be
> using the system. We want to transfer it to Access.
> Thanks
> "Keith Kratochvil" wrote:
>> You are taking a big step backward going from SQL Server to MS Access and
>> an
>> even bigger step if you go to Excel.
>> Microsoft SQL Server is an enterprise level relational database
>> management
>> system.
>> Microsoft Access is a database engine but it is not quite enterprise
>> level.
>> MS Excel is can be used to display information to management types and
>> create pretty reports, but it is by no means an enterprise storage
>> technology.
>>
>> IF your host sends you the correct information -- backup files created
>> via
>> the T-SQL BACKUP command OR database and log files after they ran
>> sp_detach_db -- you should be able to restore the database(s) to a SQL
>> Server in your environment.
>>
>> SQL Server does not have "files" (like Excel). It is more similar to MS
>> Access in that it has tables within one container (a database).
>>
>> --
>> Keith Kratochvil
>>
>> "Eddie" <Eddie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:389AA3B8-1996-487C-A65D-29F4E5404246@.microsoft.com...
>> >I currently have a database through a company that has been upkeeping
>> >SQL
>> >and
>> > storing data. I am cancelling subscription and want to retrieve data.
>> > They
>> > are sending me a backup DVD with all the files. How easy is it to use
>> > Microsoft SQL and can the files be transfered to another program such
>> > as
>> > Access or Excel'
>> >
>> > Thanks
>>|||Eddie,
You can certainly use Access as the front-end program for
your users, even if you maintain the data in SQL Server.
SQL Server in fact has no front-end, really - just a set of
management tools, so you have many options for your
users.
Since no one has mentioned it, don't overlook the Workgroup
Edition of SQL Server, which might be good for your needs.
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/features/compare-features.mspx
Steve Kass
Drew University
Eddie wrote:
>The company is not using the system to it's fullest potential. The users are
>not computer savvy and would prefer a more simple system ie: Access. They
>don't want to be paying the fees associated to a program they don't use.
>They have 7 years of data they need to access and I have to figure out how.
>Once we access the data and can retrieve the reports and pictures we won't be
>using the system. We want to transfer it to Access.
>Thanks
>"Norman Yuan" wrote:
>
>>Are you saying that you have data stored in a SQL Server database, which is
>>hosted by other company, and you now want to sotre your data by yourself? If
>>so, the best way to do is to set up your own SQL Server, have you data on
>>the other SQL Server backed up and restore it on your own SQL Server. (or
>>use detach/attach database from/to SQL Server).
>>There are different edition of SQL Server, from very expensive Enterprise
>>Edition, to free version of SQL Server Express/MSDE. If your data value is
>>not so big (2G or 4G), you can use MSDE or SQL Server Express for free. Of
>>course, some basic knowledge on SQL Server is required (I mean a bit more
>>and complicated that required by using Access).
>>If you want those data being transferred to Access DB, then you can ask your
>>SQL Server host to export it to a *.mdb file. However, in general, only data
>>can be transferred, server object used in that database (view, sp... they
>>may contain critical logics for using the database) would not be
>>transferred. So, you would need to build a sort of front end app inorder to
>>use your data. Unless the only thing you need is the data.
>>"Eddie" <Eddie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>news:389AA3B8-1996-487C-A65D-29F4E5404246@.microsoft.com...
>>
>>I currently have a database through a company that has been upkeeping SQL
>>and
>>storing data. I am cancelling subscription and want to retrieve data.
>>They
>>are sending me a backup DVD with all the files. How easy is it to use
>>Microsoft SQL and can the files be transfered to another program such as
>>Access or Excel'
>>Thanks
>>
>>|||So, summarize what you want:
1. You have data stored in database of someone's SQL Server;
2. You need to get all data out in this database and svae them in some
formats you choose;
3. You do not need application related server objects/logics in the database
(views, stored procedures, UDFs) once you retrieved the data;
4. The SQL Server host would not do the data retrieving for you. They can
only give you the backup or data file of the database.
Since you want to transfer data from SQL Server to Access (more accurately,
Jet database), there may be some degree of data or data type or data
accuracy loss because of the differences of the two data engine.
Here is what I would do:
1. Get full backup or detached database file (latter would be better);
2. Install a MSDE, which is free version of SQL Server, if the data file of
the database (*.mdf) is less than 2GB.
3. Restore/attach the databse to MSDE.
4. Use Access as tool to connect to MSDE and start retrieve data. You can
create an Access ADP project to use as MSDE front end UI. Then you can open
each table to export, or write some macro/VBA code to retireve specific data
and output to specific format.
5. Since I have the database on my onw, no-cost MSDE engine, I can try and
try until satisfied totally (of course do it on a copy of the data).
6, Do the final retrieving and then uninstall the MSDE.
"Eddie" <Eddie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:E426270B-5851-456C-B190-1D747BAFA433@.microsoft.com...
> The company is not using the system to it's fullest potential. The users
> are
> not computer savvy and would prefer a more simple system ie: Access. They
> don't want to be paying the fees associated to a program they don't use.
> They have 7 years of data they need to access and I have to figure out
> how.
> Once we access the data and can retrieve the reports and pictures we won't
> be
> using the system. We want to transfer it to Access.
> Thanks
> "Norman Yuan" wrote:
>> Are you saying that you have data stored in a SQL Server database, which
>> is
>> hosted by other company, and you now want to sotre your data by yourself?
>> If
>> so, the best way to do is to set up your own SQL Server, have you data on
>> the other SQL Server backed up and restore it on your own SQL Server. (or
>> use detach/attach database from/to SQL Server).
>> There are different edition of SQL Server, from very expensive Enterprise
>> Edition, to free version of SQL Server Express/MSDE. If your data value
>> is
>> not so big (2G or 4G), you can use MSDE or SQL Server Express for free.
>> Of
>> course, some basic knowledge on SQL Server is required (I mean a bit more
>> and complicated that required by using Access).
>> If you want those data being transferred to Access DB, then you can ask
>> your
>> SQL Server host to export it to a *.mdb file. However, in general, only
>> data
>> can be transferred, server object used in that database (view, sp... they
>> may contain critical logics for using the database) would not be
>> transferred. So, you would need to build a sort of front end app inorder
>> to
>> use your data. Unless the only thing you need is the data.
>> "Eddie" <Eddie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:389AA3B8-1996-487C-A65D-29F4E5404246@.microsoft.com...
>> >I currently have a database through a company that has been upkeeping
>> >SQL
>> >and
>> > storing data. I am cancelling subscription and want to retrieve data.
>> > They
>> > are sending me a backup DVD with all the files. How easy is it to use
>> > Microsoft SQL and can the files be transfered to another program such
>> > as
>> > Access or Excel'
>> >
>> > Thanks
>>

Purchasing And Licensing

If we own two standard edition SQL Server licenses that we can use for Report Services and a SQL Server running on another server, how does the report server recognize I have a valid license? The setup doesn't ask for any sort of license key... we don't want to install SQL server on our actual report server.
Also, how do I buy Report Services Standard Edition? I have an MSDN Universal subscription and have downloaded the developer edition, but it's time for me to use this tool in production.
-kind regards, Brian Parkerthe installation doesn't ask for any license information, and you don't have
to install sql server on your report server.
I'm not sure if RS really validates any licensing information. but the
license is the Microsoft document.
To Get RS Standard edition, go to the SQL Server web site, fill the form and
Microsoft send the RS CD Rom.
"Brian Parker" <BrianParker@.discussions.microsoft.com> a écrit dans le
message de news:C76B1A30-2238-4B3F-83E1-EBA902952969@.microsoft.com...
> If we own two standard edition SQL Server licenses that we can use for
Report Services and a SQL Server running on another server, how does the
report server recognize I have a valid license? The setup doesn't ask for
any sort of license key... we don't want to install SQL server on our
actual report server.
> Also, how do I buy Report Services Standard Edition? I have an MSDN
Universal subscription and have downloaded the developer edition, but it's
time for me to use this tool in production.
> -kind regards, Brian Parker|||You will need to buy a SQL Standard license for your server that runs RS if
it separate from your existing SQL Server licensed server.
Tom
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Jéjé" <willgart@.BBBhotmailAAA.com> wrote in message
news:%23Rjwx7xdEHA.3664@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> the installation doesn't ask for any license information, and you don't
have
> to install sql server on your report server.
> I'm not sure if RS really validates any licensing information. but the
> license is the Microsoft document.
> To Get RS Standard edition, go to the SQL Server web site, fill the form
and
> Microsoft send the RS CD Rom.
> "Brian Parker" <BrianParker@.discussions.microsoft.com> a écrit dans le
> message de news:C76B1A30-2238-4B3F-83E1-EBA902952969@.microsoft.com...
> > If we own two standard edition SQL Server licenses that we can use for
> Report Services and a SQL Server running on another server, how does the
> report server recognize I have a valid license? The setup doesn't ask for
> any sort of license key... we don't want to install SQL server on our
> actual report server.
> >
> > Also, how do I buy Report Services Standard Edition? I have an MSDN
> Universal subscription and have downloaded the developer edition, but it's
> time for me to use this tool in production.
> >
> > -kind regards, Brian Parker
>

purchasing a SQL server 2000 system table poster

I have seen a few sites on the web that was selling the SQL server 2000
system table poster. There are simular posters for Oracle 8i, 9i and 10G
(which show the layout and columns of the system table spaces, such as
dba_user, user_tables, all_tables, user_constraints, dba_constraints, etc.).
I though that i had found a place to puchase the poster for SQL server 2000
(via SQL server magazine), but their e-store was down today and I could not
find any refernce to the poster on their web site.
Can anyone think of any places that I can purcahse such a poster. I have
heard that the SQL server 2000 poster is included when you purchase SQL
server 2000 (not sure what version it is included with, either standard or
enterprise), but I would like to get my hands on the poster as I need to see
some of the tables for the project that I am working on (for reference
purposes). I have not personally purchased SQL server 2000 myself as of yet
,
hope to do so later this year).
Edward Letendre.Don't know about buying a copy - I just asked my local Microsoft TAM and
he grabbed a copy for me from Terry Clancy (the SQL Server Product
Manager for MS Australia). But you can freely download the compiled
HTML help file from microsoft.com:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techin...0/systables.asp
HTH.
*mike hodgson* |/ database administrator/ | mallesons stephen jaques
*T* +61 (2) 9296 3668 |* F* +61 (2) 9296 3885 |* M* +61 (408) 675 907
*E* mailto:mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com |* W* http://www.mallesons.com
Edward Letendre wrote:

>I have seen a few sites on the web that was selling the SQL server 2000
>system table poster. There are simular posters for Oracle 8i, 9i and 10G
>(which show the layout and columns of the system table spaces, such as
>dba_user, user_tables, all_tables, user_constraints, dba_constraints, etc.)
.
>I though that i had found a place to puchase the poster for SQL server 2000
>(via SQL server magazine), but their e-store was down today and I could not
>find any refernce to the poster on their web site.
>Can anyone think of any places that I can purcahse such a poster. I have
>heard that the SQL server 2000 poster is included when you purchase SQL
>server 2000 (not sure what version it is included with, either standard or
>enterprise), but I would like to get my hands on the poster as I need to se
e
>some of the tables for the project that I am working on (for reference
>purposes). I have not personally purchased SQL server 2000 myself as of ye
t,
>hope to do so later this year).
>Edward Letendre.
>
>

purchasing a SQL server 2000 system table poster

I have seen a few sites on the web that was selling the SQL server 2000
system table poster. There are simular posters for Oracle 8i, 9i and 10G
(which show the layout and columns of the system table spaces, such as
dba_user, user_tables, all_tables, user_constraints, dba_constraints, etc.).
I though that i had found a place to puchase the poster for SQL server 2000
(via SQL server magazine), but their e-store was down today and I could not
find any refernce to the poster on their web site.
Can anyone think of any places that I can purcahse such a poster. I have
heard that the SQL server 2000 poster is included when you purchase SQL
server 2000 (not sure what version it is included with, either standard or
enterprise), but I would like to get my hands on the poster as I need to see
some of the tables for the project that I am working on (for reference
purposes). I have not personally purchased SQL server 2000 myself as of yet,
hope to do so later this year).
Edward Letendre.This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--060404070409070500020105
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Don't know about buying a copy - I just asked my local Microsoft TAM and
he grabbed a copy for me from Terry Clancy (the SQL Server Product
Manager for MS Australia). But you can freely download the compiled
HTML help file from microsoft.com:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/productdoc/2000/systables.asp
HTH.
--
*mike hodgson* |/ database administrator/ | mallesons stephen jaques
*T* +61 (2) 9296 3668 |* F* +61 (2) 9296 3885 |* M* +61 (408) 675 907
*E* mailto:mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com |* W* http://www.mallesons.com
Edward Letendre wrote:
>I have seen a few sites on the web that was selling the SQL server 2000
>system table poster. There are simular posters for Oracle 8i, 9i and 10G
>(which show the layout and columns of the system table spaces, such as
>dba_user, user_tables, all_tables, user_constraints, dba_constraints, etc.).
>I though that i had found a place to puchase the poster for SQL server 2000
>(via SQL server magazine), but their e-store was down today and I could not
>find any refernce to the poster on their web site.
>Can anyone think of any places that I can purcahse such a poster. I have
>heard that the SQL server 2000 poster is included when you purchase SQL
>server 2000 (not sure what version it is included with, either standard or
>enterprise), but I would like to get my hands on the poster as I need to see
>some of the tables for the project that I am working on (for reference
>purposes). I have not personally purchased SQL server 2000 myself as of yet,
>hope to do so later this year).
>Edward Letendre.
>
>
--060404070409070500020105
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<tt>Don't know about buying a copy - I just asked my local Microsoft
TAM and he grabbed a copy for me from Terry Clancy (the SQL Server
Product Manager for MS Australia). But you can freely download the
compiled HTML help file from microsoft.com:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://links.10026.com/?link=http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/productdoc/2000/systables.asp</a><br>">http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/productdoc/2000/systables.asp">http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/productdoc/2000/systables.asp</a><br>
<br>
HTH.<br>
</tt>
<div class="moz-signature">
<title></title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<p><span lang="en-au"><font face="Tahoma" size="2">--<br>
</font> </span><b><span lang="en-au"><font face="Tahoma" size="2">mike
hodgson</font></span></b><span lang="en-au"> <font face="Tahoma"
size="2">|</font><i><font face="Tahoma"> </font><font face="Tahoma"
size="2"> database administrator</font></i><font face="Tahoma" size="2">
| mallesons</font><font face="Tahoma"> </font><font face="Tahoma"
size="2">stephen</font><font face="Tahoma"> </font><font face="Tahoma"
size="2"> jaques</font><font face="Tahoma"><br>
</font><b><font face="Tahoma" size="2">T</font></b><font face="Tahoma"
size="2"> +61 (2) 9296 3668 |</font><b><font face="Tahoma"> </font><font
face="Tahoma" size="2"> F</font></b><font face="Tahoma" size="2"> +61
(2) 9296 3885 |</font><b><font face="Tahoma"> </font><font
face="Tahoma" size="2">M</font></b><font face="Tahoma" size="2"> +61
(408) 675 907</font><br>
<b><font face="Tahoma" size="2">E</font></b><font face="Tahoma" size="2">
<a href="http://links.10026.com/?link=mailto:mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com">
mailto:mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com</a> |</font><b><font
face="Tahoma"> </font><font face="Tahoma" size="2">W</font></b><font
face="Tahoma" size="2"> <a href="http://links.10026.com/?link=/">http://www.mallesons.com">
http://www.mallesons.com</a></font></span> </p>
</div>
<br>
<br>
Edward Letendre wrote:
<blockquote cite="midFB9430F8-811B-46FD-B6D1-742BA999FDE4@.microsoft.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I have seen a few sites on the web that was selling the SQL server 2000
system table poster. There are simular posters for Oracle 8i, 9i and 10G
(which show the layout and columns of the system table spaces, such as
dba_user, user_tables, all_tables, user_constraints, dba_constraints, etc.).
I though that i had found a place to puchase the poster for SQL server 2000
(via SQL server magazine), but their e-store was down today and I could not
find any refernce to the poster on their web site.
Can anyone think of any places that I can purcahse such a poster. I have
heard that the SQL server 2000 poster is included when you purchase SQL
server 2000 (not sure what version it is included with, either standard or
enterprise), but I would like to get my hands on the poster as I need to see
some of the tables for the project that I am working on (for reference
purposes). I have not personally purchased SQL server 2000 myself as of yet,
hope to do so later this year).
Edward Letendre.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
--060404070409070500020105--sql

purchasing a SQL server 2000 system table poster

I have seen a few sites on the web that was selling the SQL server 2000
system table poster. There are simular posters for Oracle 8i, 9i and 10G
(which show the layout and columns of the system table spaces, such as
dba_user, user_tables, all_tables, user_constraints, dba_constraints, etc.).
I though that i had found a place to puchase the poster for SQL server 2000
(via SQL server magazine), but their e-store was down today and I could not
find any refernce to the poster on their web site.
Can anyone think of any places that I can purcahse such a poster. I have
heard that the SQL server 2000 poster is included when you purchase SQL
server 2000 (not sure what version it is included with, either standard or
enterprise), but I would like to get my hands on the poster as I need to see
some of the tables for the project that I am working on (for reference
purposes). I have not personally purchased SQL server 2000 myself as of yet,
hope to do so later this year).
Edward Letendre.
Don't know about buying a copy - I just asked my local Microsoft TAM and
he grabbed a copy for me from Terry Clancy (the SQL Server Product
Manager for MS Australia). But you can freely download the compiled
HTML help file from microsoft.com:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinf.../systables.asp
HTH.
*mike hodgson* |/ database administrator/ | mallesons stephen jaques
*T* +61 (2) 9296 3668 |* F* +61 (2) 9296 3885 |* M* +61 (408) 675 907
*E* mailto:mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com |* W* http://www.mallesons.com
Edward Letendre wrote:

>I have seen a few sites on the web that was selling the SQL server 2000
>system table poster. There are simular posters for Oracle 8i, 9i and 10G
>(which show the layout and columns of the system table spaces, such as
>dba_user, user_tables, all_tables, user_constraints, dba_constraints, etc.).
>I though that i had found a place to puchase the poster for SQL server 2000
>(via SQL server magazine), but their e-store was down today and I could not
>find any refernce to the poster on their web site.
>Can anyone think of any places that I can purcahse such a poster. I have
>heard that the SQL server 2000 poster is included when you purchase SQL
>server 2000 (not sure what version it is included with, either standard or
>enterprise), but I would like to get my hands on the poster as I need to see
>some of the tables for the project that I am working on (for reference
>purposes). I have not personally purchased SQL server 2000 myself as of yet,
>hope to do so later this year).
>Edward Letendre.
>
>

Friday, March 9, 2012

Puchasing only Enterprise Manager

hello!
I am interested in purchasing sql server.
Is it possible to purchase a Enterprise Manager only? So
I do not have to buy complete SQL server?
thanks,
DanielThe only thing you can DO with EM is connect and manage an existing instance
of SQL Server. This presupposes that you have already purchased a SQL
Server license. If you have a license for SQL Server you can install the
client tools (Query Analyzer, Enterprise Manager, etc...) on any number of
computers without additional licensing fees.
"Daniel Kim" <daekim_2000@.netzero.net> wrote in message
news:108901c3820b$9bcf6fa0$a001280a@.phx.gbl...
> hello!
> I am interested in purchasing sql server.
> Is it possible to purchase a Enterprise Manager only? So
> I do not have to buy complete SQL server?
> thanks,
> Daniel|||I believe this depends on if the existing license is per-processor or
per-seat.
One option would be to buy the Developer edition for $49, which comes with
the client tools.
Kevin3NF
"Don Peterson" <no1@.nunya.com> wrote in message
news:Otab9zggDHA.3616@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> The only thing you can DO with EM is connect and manage an existing
instance
> of SQL Server. This presupposes that you have already purchased a SQL
> Server license. If you have a license for SQL Server you can install the
> client tools (Query Analyzer, Enterprise Manager, etc...) on any number of
> computers without additional licensing fees.
> "Daniel Kim" <daekim_2000@.netzero.net> wrote in message
> news:108901c3820b$9bcf6fa0$a001280a@.phx.gbl...
> > hello!
> >
> > I am interested in purchasing sql server.
> > Is it possible to purchase a Enterprise Manager only? So
> > I do not have to buy complete SQL server?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Daniel
>