Q on joining tables with nullable fields

Question.
I have a new table that I am adding to a script that I wrote. This
table has 3 fields, the first 2 fields are used in the on statement as
being = other fields in the script.

The first field always has data in it, but the 2nd field is sometimes
null.

So my problem is if both fields have data in them and they both match
to the data in the fields that I am linking them to, then it returns
the 3rd field without a problem. However if the 2nd field is null then
it is returning a null for the 3rd field. I have checked and the field
that I am linking to is null also.

So if I have

select t1.field1, t1.field2, t2.field1, t2.field2, t2.field3
from table1 t1
join table2 t2
on t1.field1=t2.field1 and t1.field2=t2.field2

with 2 records in each table
table1: record1: data, data
record2: data, null
table2: record1: data,data,data
record2: data,null,data

what I get from the script is
record1: data, data,data,data,data
record2: data,null,data,null,null

I would expect
record2: data,null,data,null,data

I hope this makes sense, I didn't want to post the entire actual script
as it is about 150 lines long.

Thanks in advance.mike wrote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by

I have a new table that I am adding to a script that I wrote. This
table has 3 fields, the first 2 fields are used in the on statement as
being = other fields in the script.
>
The first field always has data in it, but the 2nd field is sometimes
null.
>
So my problem is if both fields have data in them and they both match
to the data in the fields that I am linking them to, then it returns
the 3rd field without a problem. However if the 2nd field is null then
it is returning a null for the 3rd field. I have checked and the field
that I am linking to is null also.
>
So if I have
>
select t1.field1, t1.field2, t2.field1, t2.field2, t2.field3
from table1 t1
join table2 t2
on t1.field1=t2.field1 and t1.field2=t2.field2
>
with 2 records in each table
table1: record1: data, data
record2: data, null
table2: record1: data,data,data
record2: data,null,data
>
what I get from the script is
record1: data, data,data,data,data
record2: data,null,data,null,null
>
>
I would expect
record2: data,null,data,null,data

Please use sample data like 'A', 'B', 'C', etc., instead of "data" which
is much more confusing.

Run some sanity checks on the data:

select * from table1 where field2 is null
select * from table1 where field2 = 'NULL'

select * from table2 where field2 is null
select * from table2 where field2 = 'NULL'

What tool are you using to pull the data? Some clients (e.g. Crystal
Reports) have a "convert nulls to empty values" option.|||Yes using select statements like that does return the data where field2
is null.
This is just using query analyzer. This is part of a view that I am
making some changes to.
Also I have tried using the SET ANSI_NULLS ON and SET ANSI_NULLS OFF
and it made no difference.

Ed Murphy wrote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by

mike wrote:
>

Quote:

Originally Posted by

I have a new table that I am adding to a script that I wrote. This
table has 3 fields, the first 2 fields are used in the on statement as
being = other fields in the script.

The first field always has data in it, but the 2nd field is sometimes
null.

So my problem is if both fields have data in them and they both match
to the data in the fields that I am linking them to, then it returns
the 3rd field without a problem. However if the 2nd field is null then
it is returning a null for the 3rd field. I have checked and the field
that I am linking to is null also.

So if I have

select t1.field1, t1.field2, t2.field1, t2.field2, t2.field3
from table1 t1
join table2 t2
on t1.field1=t2.field1 and t1.field2=t2.field2

with 2 records in each table
table1: record1: data, data
record2: data, null
table2: record1: data,data,data
record2: data,null,data

what I get from the script is
record1: data, data,data,data,data
record2: data,null,data,null,null

I would expect
record2: data,null,data,null,data

>
Please use sample data like 'A', 'B', 'C', etc., instead of "data" which
is much more confusing.
>
Run some sanity checks on the data:
>
select * from table1 where field2 is null
select * from table1 where field2 = 'NULL'
>
select * from table2 where field2 is null
select * from table2 where field2 = 'NULL'
>
What tool are you using to pull the data? Some clients (e.g. Crystal
Reports) have a "convert nulls to empty values" option.

|||Oh yea, and one thing I forgot is that my join is a Left Outer, if I
make it an inner join the records with the NULL just don't show at all.
So the issue is within the linking.

mike wrote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by

Yes using select statements like that does return the data where field2
is null.
This is just using query analyzer. This is part of a view that I am
making some changes to.
Also I have tried using the SET ANSI_NULLS ON and SET ANSI_NULLS OFF
and it made no difference.
>
Ed Murphy wrote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by

mike wrote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by

I have a new table that I am adding to a script that I wrote. This
table has 3 fields, the first 2 fields are used in the on statement as
being = other fields in the script.
>
The first field always has data in it, but the 2nd field is sometimes
null.
>
So my problem is if both fields have data in them and they both match
to the data in the fields that I am linking them to, then it returns
the 3rd field without a problem. However if the 2nd field is null then
it is returning a null for the 3rd field. I have checked and the field
that I am linking to is null also.
>
So if I have
>
select t1.field1, t1.field2, t2.field1, t2.field2, t2.field3
from table1 t1
join table2 t2
on t1.field1=t2.field1 and t1.field2=t2.field2
>
with 2 records in each table
table1: record1: data, data
record2: data, null
table2: record1: data,data,data
record2: data,null,data
>
what I get from the script is
record1: data, data,data,data,data
record2: data,null,data,null,null
>
>
I would expect
record2: data,null,data,null,data

Please use sample data like 'A', 'B', 'C', etc., instead of "data" which
is much more confusing.

Run some sanity checks on the data:

select * from table1 where field2 is null
select * from table1 where field2 = 'NULL'

select * from table2 where field2 is null
select * from table2 where field2 = 'NULL'

What tool are you using to pull the data? Some clients (e.g. Crystal
Reports) have a "convert nulls to empty values" option.

|||Ok I finally got it. I still don't know why that didn't work. But
here is what I did instead and it worked.
On the join I changed it to the following.

On t1.field1=t2.field1 and (case when t1.field2 is null then '' else
t1.field2 end)=(case when t2.field2 is null then '' else t2.field2 end)

mike wrote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by

Oh yea, and one thing I forgot is that my join is a Left Outer, if I
make it an inner join the records with the NULL just don't show at all.
So the issue is within the linking.
>
mike wrote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by

Yes using select statements like that does return the data where field2
is null.
This is just using query analyzer. This is part of a view that I am
making some changes to.
Also I have tried using the SET ANSI_NULLS ON and SET ANSI_NULLS OFF
and it made no difference.

Ed Murphy wrote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by

mike wrote:
>
I have a new table that I am adding to a script that I wrote. This
table has 3 fields, the first 2 fields are used in the on statement as
being = other fields in the script.

The first field always has data in it, but the 2nd field is sometimes
null.

So my problem is if both fields have data in them and they both match
to the data in the fields that I am linking them to, then it returns
the 3rd field without a problem. However if the 2nd field is null then
it is returning a null for the 3rd field. I have checked and the field
that I am linking to is null also.

So if I have

select t1.field1, t1.field2, t2.field1, t2.field2, t2.field3
from table1 t1
join table2 t2
on t1.field1=t2.field1 and t1.field2=t2.field2

with 2 records in each table
table1: record1: data, data
record2: data, null
table2: record1: data,data,data
record2: data,null,data

what I get from the script is
record1: data, data,data,data,data
record2: data,null,data,null,null


I would expect
record2: data,null,data,null,data
>
Please use sample data like 'A', 'B', 'C', etc., instead of "data" which
is much more confusing.
>
Run some sanity checks on the data:
>
select * from table1 where field2 is null
select * from table1 where field2 = 'NULL'
>
select * from table2 where field2 is null
select * from table2 where field2 = 'NULL'
>
What tool are you using to pull the data? Some clients (e.g. Crystal
Reports) have a "convert nulls to empty values" option.

|||mike wrote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by

Ok I finally got it. I still don't know why that didn't work.

Nulls are not considered equal to anything, not even other nulls.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_(SQL)

Quote:

Originally Posted by

But here is what I did instead and it worked.
On the join I changed it to the following.
>
On t1.field1=t2.field1 and (case when t1.field2 is null then '' else
t1.field2 end)=(case when t2.field2 is null then '' else t2.field2 end)

Equivalent and shorter:

on t1.field1 = t2.field1
and coalesce(t1.field2,'') = coalesce(t2.field2,'')

coalesce() is a function that takes one or more argument and returns the
first non-null value among them, or null if they're all null.

Pull an Image from a Database onto a Report Problems

Does anyone know if the following is possible? If so, any pointers on how
to accomplish it?
I have a table in SQL 2000 containing two fields "StoredDoc" and
"StoredDocExtension".
The StoredDoc field is a ntext field. the StoredDocExtension is a char
field.
When uploading an image to the database, the image is stored directly in the
StoredDoc field. The file extension for the file is stored in the
StoredDocExtension field.
I want to create a report that will display the image stored in the
StoredDoc field directly on the report at runtime. If possible, I would
also like the MIME/Type property to be set based on the StoredDocExtension
field.
I have been trying to get this to work tonight and all I get is a red x
where the image should be.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
JWYou can set the MIME/Type property based on a database field using the
Properties tab of the image. I am not sure if thats what is you are
looking for.
Ravi|||I was able to do that, but I am running into problems converting the image,
which is stored as a ntext value in the database to the actual picture, when
the report is run.
I wasn't sure if Reporting services was able to handle that or if you needed
to do something special to get the image to show up.
Thanks for the help.
JW
"Ravi R" <bofobofo@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1110480130.355102.180250@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> You can set the MIME/Type property based on a database field using the
> Properties tab of the image. I am not sure if thats what is you are
> looking for.
> Ravi
>|||Database images have to be byte arrays in Base 64 encoding.
You may want to try this image.Value expression (assuming your images are
not encoded as Ole-Images which is typical for Access databases):
=System.Convert.FromBase64String(Fields!ImageNTextColumn.Value)
-- Robert
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Jeremy Wright" <jwright@.twostep.com> wrote in message
news:uXGxuMaJFHA.580@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>I was able to do that, but I am running into problems converting the image,
> which is stored as a ntext value in the database to the actual picture,
> when
> the report is run.
> I wasn't sure if Reporting services was able to handle that or if you
> needed
> to do something special to get the image to show up.
> Thanks for the help.
> JW
> "Ravi R" <bofobofo@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1110480130.355102.180250@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>> You can set the MIME/Type property based on a database field using the
>> Properties tab of the image. I am not sure if thats what is you are
>> looking for.
>> Ravi
>